Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Module 1 Assignment...
For this week’s application assignment let's choose Starbucks which provides High-quality coffee to their customers. Before discussing the characteristics of what makes the company have high quality (...

Module 1 Assignment 2
Module 1 Assignment 2

For this week’s application assignment let's cho

Module 5 discussion_...
Many experts hypothesize that mothers may impact their daughter’s eating disorder

Module 5 Discussion
Module 5 Discussion

Many experts hypothesize that mothers may impact t

w6 assignemnt_164611...
Asymmetric information is the difference between the information among the two parties. It leads to various discrepancies in a business or a social trade. Most commonly, asymmetric information is used...

Week 6 Assignment
Week 6 Assignment

Asymmetric information is the difference between t

Week 6-Case Analysis 1

Week 6-Case Analysis 1

Q The purpose of this assignment is to explain the right of privacy afforded under the US Constitution and summarize key federal regulations addressing privacy. Instructions: 1. Pick one of the cases listed below. a. Is a warrant required for access to email? b. Supreme court tackles case involving cell phone privacy c. General Motors ONSTAR collecting information on owners/drivers forever 2. For your selection give: a. A summary of the case b. A discussion of the privacy considerations tested by the courts c. The final ruling of the court, if any d. Implications for the future based on the Constitution and this ruling/case. e. What regulations or Federal Regulatory agency would cover this incident? f. What does this case mean for other Technologies or online services not directly addressed by the case (Example if it is a case about email - are there implications for the internet or cell phones?) Submission Instructions: • Submit your case as a WORD document in the drop box for that assignment. (Properly formatted in MLA) Grading Criteria: • Refer to the grading Rubric for case analyses for additional guidance. • Worth 4 Points Assinmgent due Sunday, by 11:59pm EST.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
Summary of the Case: In Carpenter v. United States, the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Supreme Court to see if it permits authorities to get mobile phone location records that show a person's whereabouts and movements over 127 days without a warrant. The information was provided by Carpenter's cellular service provider after Timothy Carpenter's phone was monitored by Detroit police in 2011 (Carpenter V. United States). These data allowed them to keep track of Carpenter's movements over a four-month period. Using information from such databases, Carpenter was partially held responsible for six different robberies. Carpenter complained to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals about the government's acquisition and review of those records, claiming that it violated his Fourth Amendment rights.